Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching

Emine Eda ERCAN DEMİREL

Özet


This present study aims to investigate the efficiency of cooperative learning and traditional instruction in terms of vocabulary recognition in foreign language teaching. In line with this purpose, the study searches for the answer of the following research question: “Is there a significant difference between the vocabulary learning performances of the students who were taught through cooperative learning method and the students who were taught through traditional methods?” and tries to find out  whether students’ vocabulary could be enriched through an instruction which emphasizes the role of cooperation rather than competition among students in teaching vocabulary. The study employs a quantitative research design comparing cooperative learning versus traditional method in terms of vocabulary learning/teaching. The instruments of the study cover a pre-test, a post-test, 8 reading texts, worksheets, posters, and quizzes. The test in concern- the vocabulary test- underwent a process with the guidance and supervision of language and scale development experts, and then was finalised to be used as the pre-test and post-test (Cronbach’s alpha 0.83). The participants were freshmen at Selcuk University School of Foreign Languages (SOFL). The study was carried out in a four-week experimental process on two groups- experimental and control – each of which consisted of 18 students. A pre-test was applied at the beginning of the process to make sure if the two groups were equal in terms of their prior vocabulary knowledge and see the improvement afterwards. Throughout the study, the experimental group experienced learning vocabulary through Cooperative Learning (CL) and the control group was taught through traditional instruction- the gloss and the use of a monolingual dictionary with the same vocabulary syllabus for both groups. At the end of four weeks, a post-test -the same as the pre-test- was applied. Collected data was analysed through SPSS.  The results indicated that the participants of the experimental group who had the Cooperative Learning experience led to better results in terms of vocabulary learning than the other students who were taught through the traditional instruction.  


Anahtar Kelimeler


vocabulary learning, cooperative learning, student-based learning

Tam Metin:

PDF

Referanslar


Açıkgöz, K. (1990). “İşbirliğine Dayalı Öğrenme Ve Geleneksel Öğretimin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısı,

Hatırda Tutma Düzeyleri Ve Duyuşsal Özellikleri Üzerindeki Etkileri”. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi I. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Ankara, Sept. 25-28 (MEB Yay., 1993; pp.187-201).

Ahmad, Z. & Mahmood, N. (2010). “Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional Instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Learning Experience and Achievement”, Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, vol: 43, no: 1, pp. 151-164.

Ajaja, P. O. & Eravwoke, O. U. (2010). “Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy on Junior Secondary School Students Achievement in Integrated Science”. Electronic Journal of Science Education,Vol. 14, No. 1 (http://ejse.southwestern.edu).

Butler, Linda. Password 1: a reading and vocabulary text, New York, Longman, 2003.

Büyükkaragöz, Savaş. Program Geliştirme Kaynak Metinler, Konya, Kuzucular Ofset, 1997.

Demirel, Özcan. İlköğretim Okullarında Yabancı Dil Öğretimi, İstanbul, Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1999.

Ercan, E. E. (2009). “Teaching Vocabulary Through Cooperative Learning”. Unpublished MA thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Erdem, Mete, Defne. Opinions of Pre-service English Language Teachers on an Intercultural Training Integrated Oral Communication Skills Course, (in Educational Sciences ed. Kutlu, O., pp.31-50), Ankara, Akademisyen Kitabevi, 2018.

Gillies, Robyn, M. & Ashman, Adrian F. Cooperative Learning The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups, Great Britain, MPG Books Ltd, 2003.

Gillies, Robyn,M.& Ashman, Adrian F.& Terwel, Jan. The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, New York, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2008.

Gull, F. & Shehzad, S. (2015). “Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement”. Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 9(3) pp. 246-255.

Gürsoy, E. (2001). “Verbal or Visual? Investigating Ways to Teach Vocabulary”. The 5th International Inged ELT Conference, Anadolu University School of Foreign Languages, Eskişehir, Turkey, November 15-17 (pp. 182-190).

Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching, England, Pearson Education Limited, 2001.

Jacob, Evelyn. Cooperative Learning in Context, United States, State University of New York Press, 1999.

Jacobs, George M. & Power, Michael A. & Inn, Loh Wan. The Teacher’s Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning, United States of America, Corwin Press, Inc., 2002.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. T. (2002). “Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta-analysis, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22:1, 95-105, DOI:10.1080/0218879020220110

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. T. (2017). “Cooperative Learning”. Innovacion Educacion I Congresso Internacional, Zaragoza, Sept. 22-23.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. (1998). “Cooperative Learning Returns to College What Evidence Is There That It Works?”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30:4, 26-35,

DOI: 10.1080/00091389809602629

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). “Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis”, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota.

Kagan, Spencer. Cooperative Learning, United States, Resources for Teachers, Inc., 1994.

Kessler, Carolyn. Cooperative Language Learning A Teacher’s Resource Book, United States of America, Prentice Hall Regents, Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1992.

Lazarowitz, Rachel Hertz & Miller, Norman. Interaction in Cooperative Groups, United States of America, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Marzban, A. & Alinejad, F. (2014). “The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 3744 – 3748.

Nunan, David. Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching, Great Britain, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Öztürk, M.S. & Yorgancı, M. (2017). “Effects of L1 and L2 Glosses on Incidental Vocabulary Learning of EFL Prep Students/Okuma Yoluyla Tesadüfi Kelime Öğrenme Üzerinde Ana Dil (L1) Ve Hedef Dildeki (L2) Açıklamaların Etkisi”. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, ISSN: 1308-2140, (Prof. Dr. Tahsin Aktaş Armağanı) Volume 12/6, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11432, p. 635-656.

Putnam, Joanne W. Cooperative Learning and Strategies for Inclusion, United States of America, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc., 1993.

Shachar, Hanna. Who gains what from co-operative learning, (Chapter 7 in Cooperative Learning The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups eds. Gillies, R.M.&Ashman,A.F.), Great Britain, MPG Books Ltd., 2003.

Sharan, Shlomo. & Shaulov, Ada. Cooperative Learning, Motivation to Learn, and Academic Achievement, (Chapter 8 in Cooperative Learning Theory and Research ed. Sharan, S.), New York, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., 1990.

Sharan, Shlomo & Shachar, Hana. Language and Learning in the Cooperative Classroom, New York, Springer Verlag, 1988.

Slavin, Robert E. Cooperative Learning Theory, Research, and Practice, United States of America, Simon& Schuster Company, 1995.

Slavin, R. E. (2014). “Making Cooperative Learning Powerful”. Educational Leadership, Vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 22-26.

Tran, V. D. (2014). “The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention”. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp.131-140.


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.