Comparison of Technical Drawing Course Education Model; The Case of Selcuk University Department of Interior Architecture
Öz
In the wake of the February 2023 earthquake in Turkey, many educational institutions, including Selcuk University, adopted a partially distance education system for various courses. This study aims to assess the course performance of 70 students enrolled in the Technical Drawing-2 course, delivered via distance education in the spring semester, in comparison to their performance in the Technical Drawing-1 course, which was conducted in person during the fall semester of the same academic year. The study employed a psychometric measurement technique. The datas were converted into numerical data using SPSS version 29. The survey was designed using a 5-point Likert-type measurement model. The survey used a single group pre-test (Distance Education Model)-post-test (Face to Face Education Model) design. The data was analyzed using the dependent t-test, frequency analysis, normality test, and Cronbach Alpha reliability analysis. The survey results indicate that students who took the Technical Drawing-2 course through both distance learning and face-to-face methods found the distance learning approach beneficial for sharing information about the course material. However, they also expressed a preference for face-to-face lessons. Moreover, they can better articulate their thoughts in a traditional classroom setting compared to a remote learning environment.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Metin:
PDFReferanslar
Altawalbeh, K., & Al-Ajlouni, A. (2022). The impact of distance learning on science education during the pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 5(1), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.195.
Aristeidou, M., & Cross, S. (2021). The impact of the covid-19 disruption on distance learning higher education students and activities. 7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’21) (pp. 695-702). Valencia: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.
Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20-31.
Cridlin, L. D. (2007). The İmportance of Hands-On Learning. Journal of Laser Applications, 151-156.
Çalışkan, S., & Ozcan, D. (2017). Determining student satisfaction in distance education courses. Science Direct Available Procedia Computer Science. 120 (2017) 529–538.
Faresta, R. A. (2024). Book review, onlıne postgraduate educatıon: re-imagınıng openness, dıstance and interactıon. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 260-263.
Fırat, M., Kılınç, H., & Yüzer, V. (2018). Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assited Learning, (34):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12214.
Gaidelys, V., Čiutienė, R., & Cibulskas, G. (2023). An assessment of the impact of distance learning on pupils’ performance. Education Science., 14, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci13010003 s 4-19.
Hakkari, F. (2018). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim derslerine yönelik görüşleri. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, vol:5 issue:23, p: 1140-1151.
Kang, B. (2021). The future of service post-covid-19 pandemic. Seoul: Springer.
Karagülle, C. (2023). Covid-19 pandemisinin mimarlık eğitimine etkileri üzerine bir araştırma. Online Journal of Art and Design, 1-11.
Kürtüncü, M., & Kurt, A. (2020). Covıd-19 pandemisi döneminde hemşirelik öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim konusunda yaşadıkları sorunlar. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt 7, SayıI 5 Yıl 2020, S 66-77.
Malik, S. K. (2015). Strategies for maintaining quality in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 238-248.
Metin, A. E., Karaman, A., & Şaştım, A. Y. (2017). Öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitim sistemine bakış açısı ve uzaktan eğitim ingilizce dersinin verimliliğinin değerlendirilmesi: banaz meslek yüksekokulu. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt:7, S:2. (641,652).
Mun, B., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2018). Mimarlıkta yaparak öğrenme ve bir araştırma ortamı olarak öğrencilerin ürettiği geçici strüktürler. International Journal on Mathematics, Engineering and Natural Sciences, 12-25.
Noraslı, M. (2024). Evaluation of distance education in applied courses by interior architecture department students in pandemic and post-earthquake practices. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 386-397.
Provenzi, L., & Tronick, E. (2020). The power of disconnection during the covid-19 emergency: from isolation to reparation. psychological trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12(S1). https:// doi.org/10.1037/tra0000619.
Sakarya, K. (2021). Pandemi sürecinde uzaktan eğitim ile yürütülen teknik resim dersine dair bir değerlendirme: çukurova üniversitesi iç mimarlık bölümü örneği. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Sayı: 25, 282 – 290.
Serçemeli, M., & Kurnaz, E. (2020). Covıd-19 pandemi döneminde öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitim ve uzaktan muhasebe eğitimine yönelik bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 40-53.
Seyhan, A. (2021). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının covid-19 salgını sürecinde uzaktan eğitim deneyimleri ve görüşleri. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.910385.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6). Boston, MA.: Pearson.
Yalman, M. (2013). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin bilgisayar destekli uzaktan eğitim sistemi (moodle) memnuniyet düzeyleri. International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, volume 8/8 P. 1395-1406.
Refback'ler
- Şu halde refbacks yoktur.
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.